EPIONE focuses on cases involving chronic pain, spine disorders, musculoskeletal injury, interventional treatment, and complex questions of function and future medical care.
Medical-legal questions involving pain, spine disorders, and musculoskeletal injury often require more than identification of an abnormality on imaging.
The significance of that abnormality—and its relationship to symptoms, function, treatment, prognosis, and causation requires clinical context.
Dr. Bernhardt brings extensive experience evaluating and treating these conditions to independent medical evaluation and expert analysis.
Cervical, thoracic, and lumbar disorders represent a substantial component of interventional pain practice and frequently present challenging questions regarding diagnosis, causation, treatment, and impairment.
Areas of expertise include:
Evaluation considers the relationship among mechanism of injury, symptoms, physical findings, diagnostic imaging, electrodiagnostic testing when applicable, treatment response, and functional limitations.
Musculoskeletal cases frequently involve a combination of traumatic injury, underlying pathology, degenerative disease, altered biomechanics, and persistent functional limitation.
Dr. Bernhardt routinely evaluates joint and soft-tissue conditions involving the:
Medical-legal analysis may include questions of traumatic versus degenerative pathology, treatment necessity, residual functional loss, prognosis, impairment, and future medical needs.
As an actively practicing interventional pain physician, Dr. Bernhardt has extensive experience with the procedures commonly encountered in disputed treatment, causation, standard-of-care, and future-medical-care analyses.
These include:
This experience allows evaluation not only of whether a procedure was performed, but also its indication, clinical rationale, expected benefit, alternatives, risks, response, and role in future care.
Complex cases may progress beyond conventional medication, therapy, or injection-based treatment.
Medical-legal analysis may address patient selection, prior treatment failure, indications, expected outcomes, complications, revision or replacement requirements, and anticipated long-term care.
Long-term pharmacologic treatment of chronic pain can create difficult questions involving medical necessity, efficacy, tolerance, adverse effects, opioid-related complications, and future treatment.
Evaluation may include:
An injury cannot be understood solely by assigning a diagnosis.
Medical-legal evaluation may require determining how the condition affects the individual’s ability to function in everyday life, including:
When applicable, workers’ compensation impairment analysis is performed using the appropriate Fifth edition AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, including analysis of activities of daily living and alternative rating methodology when medically and legally appropriate. Impairment evaluation in other medical-legal contexts may utilize the Fourth or Sixth Edition, as appropriate to the jurisdiction and purpose of the evaluation.
The presence of a medical condition does not, by itself, establish its cause.
Evaluation may require distinguishing among the effects of:
Each factor is considered in the context of the history, objective findings, diagnostic evidence, treatment course, and current functional status.
For patients with significant injury or chronic pain, future medical needs may extend for years.
Dr. Bernhardt evaluates future care based upon the underlying diagnosis, clinical course, previous treatment and response, current functional status, prognosis, and reasonable anticipated treatment needs.
This may include future physician care, diagnostic testing, medications, rehabilitation, interventional procedures, surgery, neuromodulation, durable medical equipment, and other medically appropriate services.
Learn About Life Care Planning →
Discuss Your Case